Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said
nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can realise
our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
Faith provides secular and religious certainty, the
greater the certainty the greater the danger to humanity.
Incoherence is
not a property of God it is a property of man.
It appears humanity
as a species is becoming very aware:
1.
there
is no such thing as freedom just a relative degree of independence we grant
each other and
2.
evangelical
extremes based on the notion of freedom of religion in particular without human
rights boundary constraints leaves a swath of humanity subject to the violent
oppressive tenants of babbling myopic fools.
It is only by
setting up a human society devoid of the notion of sovereignty, based on
enabling the independence of other first, and framed by now well understood
human rights doctrine which maximize the potential independence of the
individual rather than constrain it for the gratification of a few.
Religion will be
subject to the same legislative constraints and privileges as the secular for
religion is no different than any other human organization within society.
Religion will no longer be able to call for the continuance
of religion to be able discriminate against citizens whilst demanding
the rest of the community should not discriminate against religions themselves.
Such a position continues to subvert equal opportunity and many fundamental
human right tenets supposedly the basis of vibrant Democracies.
The notion of culture
or sovereignty, religious or secular, should no longer be allowed to be used as
an excuse to ignore the plight and subjugation of fellow humans.
Fear as Darkness Seeps and the
Steps of History Creak
Ayatollah Khamenei you are so perverse you
believe perversion normative.
You expect adherence of the rest of humanity to a twisted
delusional dogma.
Ayatollah Khamenei your pearly white teeth drip with the blood of your and my
sisters and brothers. The more you kill the more you will have to kill. As your kind such as Stalin before you. You spread your
disease of hate before you as rose petals under the maimed and cold bodies you
and your diabolical black clubbing shirted thugs have laid waste.
How dare you define humanity as being able to be partitioned into separate
sovereignty devoid of reflection of your brutal purpose of suppression and death. You say we should remain silent. You are my
neighbour and I am yours. If your house burns do I stand back warm my hands? Do
I close my ears to the screams of anguish?
Ayatollah Khamenei your primitive thoughts and actions belong to a style of a
culture devoid of enlightenment.
Yours is a culture of
‘Death to ….’! ; ‘Death to ….’! ;‘Death to ….’! ;‘Death to ….’! ;
‘Death to Thought’!
‘Death to Difference’!
‘Death to Peace’!
‘Death to Knowledge’!
‘Death to Women’!
‘Death to the
Fear is you’re
only teaching and reason.
Ayatollah Khamenei surely in your nightmares your plans are confounded.
Your true self bathed in the blood of humanity reveals itself of its true
nature. If not, the blood has clearly washed away your soul and it resides
withered, twisting already in the Hell of your own imagining.
Ayatollah Khamenei, you and your myopic assistants in this most
grotesque of crimes will collapse eventually from the weight of ignominy. As
regimes of oppression, secular and religious, who have excessively gorged
themselves on the misery of humanity in the past.
Ayatollah Khamenei, you of course believe yourselves to be
reasonable men, reinforced incessantly by your companions in terror. You will
not hear adverse notions regards your behaviour nor see your own perversion in
the mirror of reality, your edifice of lies, as it would destroy the small ego
you and your followers confuse with intellect.
Ayatollah Khamenei you and
your followers suffer from a human condition of contrived ignorance. A simple
complaint which you have transformed into an art form of reinforced deception.
You perversely believe ‘Death’ to those who simply purport or support the
notion of having a differing thought to your own dogma as justified. Such
insanity you and your followers determine as normative behaviour.
I know nothing I can say will
change your path to destruction for you and the people you purport to
represent. History will be repeated. Why humanity persists in enabling such
madmen to reign supreme to its severe detriment beggars belief.
As in the past we will endeavour
not to snuff out your regime due to appeasing the mad idiot and again
humanity will reap a bloody harvest for its reticence.
Yet the world knows you Ayatollah Khamenei and
your followers as purveyors of proved dangerous gibberish. The demand for
respect for such a notion of humanity is void of the possibility of
substantiation. Fear is now your only bedfellow for survival.
This is what you are in fact Ayatollah Khamenei:
A severe discredit to the notion of religion.
A bringer of ash and dust.
A builder of empires of misery based on fear, death and the oppression of an
independent spirit.
A credit to perversion.
Any adherence on your or your follower’s part to a more pristine image of
yourselves is delusion.
May a Dust storm of Justice
swiftly swirl you and your grovelling underlings into a state of understanding
and repentance.
Henceforth for you Ayatollah Khamenei and those with blood on their
hands sleep will now never be easy nor devoid of palpable fear as darkness
seeps and the steps of history creak.
____________________________________
27th June 2009
Is it
really worth it for Humanity to persist with such a grotesque absurdity?
“TEHRAN,
Iran 26/6/2009 — A senior cleric aligned with Iran's hard-line President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called Friday for leaders of the mass protests over the
country's disputed presidential election to be dealt with
"mercilessly" and treated as enemies of God, a transgression meriting
death. “
In one society we have a
beautiful Iranian Neda Agha Soltan's subject to cold-blooded murder.
In another society we have
a senior
cleric Ayatollah Ahmed Khatamis saying "Such people are called
mohareb" — enemies of God — whose deaths are sanctioned under Islamic law.
We all know it, Muslim, Catholic,
Buddhist, communist, Democrat etc yet we continue to stoop to support our
brutality against each other from archaic documents written by man for man. We
all know it in our hearts yet some of us still persist in recognizing such
brutality as cleric Ayatollah Ahmed Khatamis as valid.
It could very well have been in our current Human circumstance “The excuse
enemies of the State”. Which in essence is the true meaning? God as usual an
unseen bystander in this circumstance where one group of humans enforces a
minority myopic view on others. As it always has been in the past.
The excuse
enemies of God – One has to ask if having a belief in this type of God with
a law surrounding it which enables the
justification of such suppression and death - Is it really worth it for
Humanity to persist with such a grotesque absurdity?
Such a statement is not a matter of a lack of respect for other
people’s values and culture. It is recognition such an act of barbarism cannot
be excused by human statutes of any kind under secular or religious tenants. It
is seen for what it is cold-blooded
murder. Is this the style of society most of us desire – I do not believe it
is.
Allowing diversity rather
than crushing it under a bloodied baton of cruel gibberish appears to be a much
happier and prosperous place to live.
_____________________________________
BBC:
"We
heard a gunshot. Neda was standing a metre away from me... I saw blood gushing
out of her chest"
The
doctor who tried to save an Iranian protester as she bled to death on a street
in
Dr
Arash Hejazi, who is studying at a university in the south of
said he
ran to Neda Agha-Soltan's aid after seeing she had been shot in the chest.
Despite
his attempts to stop the bleeding she died in less than a minute, he said.
Video
of Ms Soltan's death was posted on the internet and images of her have become a
rallying point for Iranian opposition supporters around the world.
Dr
Hejazi also told how passers-by then seized an armed Basij militia volunteer
who appeared to admit shooting Ms Soltan.
Dr
Hejazi said he had not slept for three nights following the incident, but he wanted
to speak out so that her death was not in vain.
He
doubted that he would be able to return to
"I
was there with some friends because we had heard that there were some protests
and we decided to go and take a look," he said.
"Anti-riot
police were coming by motorcycles towards the crowd."
Dr
Hejazi said he saw Ms Soltan, who he did not know, with an older man who he
thought was her father but later on learned was her music teacher.
"Suddenly
everything turned crazy. The police threw teargas and the motorcycles started
rushing towards the crowd. We ran to an intersection and people were just
standing. They didn't know what to do.
"We
heard a gunshot. Neda was standing one metre away from me. I turned back and I
saw blood gushing out of Neda's chest.
"She
was in a shocked situation, just looking at her chest. Then she lost her
control.
"We
ran to her and lay her on the ground. I saw the bullet wound just below the
neck with blood gushing out.
"I
have never seen such a thing because the bullet, it seemed to have blasted
inside her chest, and later on, blood exiting from her mouth and nose.
"I
had the impression that it had hit the lung as well. Her blood was draining out
of her body and I was just putting pressure on the wound to try to stop the
bleeding, which wasn't successful unfortunately, and she died in less than one
minute."
Dr
Hejazi said he first thought the gunshot had come from a rooftop.
But
later he saw protesters grab an armed man on a motorcycle.
"People
shouted 'we got him, we got him'. They disarmed him and took out his identity
card which showed he was a Basij member. People were furious and he was
shouting, 'I didn't want to kill her'.
"People
didn't know what do to do with him so they let him go. But they took his
identity card. There are people there who know who he is. Some people were also
taking photos of him."
Dr
Hejazi said he knew he was putting himself in jeopardy by talking about what
happened.
"It
was a tough decision to make to come out and talk about it but she died for a
cause. She was fighting for basic rights... I don't want her blood to have been
shed in vain."
He
added: "She died on the streets to say something."
Dr
Hejazi said he did not believe he could now return to
"They
are going to denounce what I am saying. They are going to put so many things on
me. I have never been in politics. I am jeopardising my situation because of
the innocent look in her (Neda's) eyes."
____________________________________
Roll UP Roll Up
See the amazing esteemed magician
Iranian Prosecutor General Saeed Mortazavi pull a giant rat out of the very
centre of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s very small turban. Using only smoke and
mirrors, with his renowned coercive powers, Prosecutor Mortazavi will then turn
this enormous rat, magically into an Iranian President.
Also starring the Islamic version of
the Catholic Spanish Inquisition the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. The Iranian
Revolutionary Guard is to do an adaptation of the Spanish Inquisitions proof
that the Earth is indeed flat.
At the very same time the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard will also prove what is an equally valid proposition Evil
European, Israeli and US agents are totally responsible for fomenting the huge
demonstrations and violence in
See the Usual Confessions of Guilt!
Have no doubt you will be amazed!
What Century is this?
____________________________________
BBC - 28th June 2009
Basij militia of carrying out night-time raids, destroying
property in private homes and beating civilians.
"Witnesses are telling us
that the Basij are trashing entire streets and even neighbourhoods as well as
individual homes trying to stop the nightly rooftop protest chants,"
What Century is this?
____________________________________
BBC 26th June 2009
Mr Obama said Mir Hossein Mousavi had captured
the imagination of groups in
He spoke of the bravery of protesters in the
face of "outrageous" violence.
_____________________________________
MPs 'snub' Ahmadinejad poll party
More than 180 Iranian MPs appear to have snubbed an invitation to celebrate President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election win, local press reports say.
All 290
MPs were invited to the victory party on Wednesday night, but only 105 turned
up, the reports say.
_____________________________________
19-Jun-2009
12:37
COMMENT:
We
would not cheat
Is Ayatollah Khamenei referring to himself or the Royal Union Ayatollah
Khamenei and Mr Ahmadinejad, the esteemed erstwhile President of historical
truism?
Ayatollah Khamenei is not unbiased. He openly supports President Ahmadinejad,
saying the president's views on foreign affairs and social issues were close to
his.
So much for objectivity of office.
It would seem the apparatus of State may have been utilised to enhance a particular
vision. Cheating MOI!?
_____________________________________
19-Jun-2009
12:07
COMMENT:
CONGRATULATIONS
Your Revolution deposed of the Shar.
You no longer have a Supreme Leader with total power.
You no longer have militias enforcing myopic dogma with intimidation and
violence.
You no longer have a select group of Guardians imposing a repressive societal
apparatus which extinguishes your aspirations.
You no longer have a dreaded 200,000 strong personal guard of the Supreme
Leader to enforce his distorted view.
CONGRATULATIONS IRAN YOU ARE A err..DEMOCRACY?
_____________________________________
19-Jun-2009
04:48
COMMENT:
How can a society have a Supreme Leader and still claim to be a Democracy.
Democracy is a reflection of the will of people.
Democracy is not the will of one person, a Supreme or a select group, the
Guardians. They certainly are not Guardians of individual independence.
Listen carefully
_____________________________________
A new constitution for
In the world we have an abundance of
talent in regards to policy formulation and implementation. The true tragedy is
that we still use the inherited wasteful feudal framework across our public and
private systems to make and implement choices within political systems across
the world.
The real challenge in the world today is not which policy but the type of
process by which policy can be more effectively formulated and inclusive to
enable the maximum potential for each of us to realise our independence. Rather
than independence for a privileged few.
As past elections have shown the worlds political systems by any measure are
clearly resulting in the misdirection of community wealth and power for the
sake of the political angle and personal benefit ahead of the needs of others.
This is reflective of our inherited feudal Democratic frameworks.
Revolution is not an option nor an answer for the changes needed to be made, we
will just end up with the same or much worse. History has clearly shown this
time and again. Violence leads to more violence. If reasoned open debate cannot
achieve change then it is change for the future not worth having.(a) Societal
and organisational studies, technological changes and our own experience
provide us with more than enough starting points to realise an effective
inclusive decision making process for a new Democracy.
In a society it is only by seeking to
enable the independence of others first that we ourselves can then maximise our
own independence. A new constitution for
(a) This does not mean one cannot
defend oneself from violence perpetrated against an individual or group which
is occurring in
_____________________________________
1st July 2009
If Insanity was a Crime Ahmadinejad Requires an Infinite Number of Lives or
Straight Jacket arrives to Late for Khamenei and Politicized Basij
.
The grief in losing a child
is unfathomable. It knows no depth. Time dulls but does not heal the pain. Take
this seriously Khamenei, Ahmadinejad
and politicized Basij.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad makes a
mockery of his request for an investigation by the judiciary into the shooting
death of beautiful Neda Agha-Soltan.
Ahmadinejad BBC (29/6/2009) suggested in the same
letter requesting the investigation that the opposition and
If insanity was a crime Ahmadinejad requires an
infinite number of life times.
The fact is the brutal killing of
beautiful Neda Agha-Soltan was a political act orchestrated by Khamenei and Ahmadinejad.
Khamenei
and Ahmadinejad unleashed the politicized Basij which
killed and maimed innocent demonstrators, beautiful Neda
Agha-Soltan was one of them. This violent oppression is a
political action designed to frighten and repress the rest of Iranian society.
A politicized Basij which is at this very moment terrorizing Iranian
neighborhoods.
Clearly to Ahmadinejad beautiful Neda
Agha-Soltan’s brutal death is an inconvenient truth only. Ahmadinejad is as much interested
in obtaining justice for beautiful Neda Agha-Soltan’s as he is in
admitting he and his erstwhile friend Khamenei were directly responsible for beautiful
Neda Agha-Soltan’s brutal death by unleashing the Basij.
Any text secular or religious in this
century which justifies the visiting of grievous harm on a citizen simply
because the citizen disagrees with its tenants in a peaceful manner needs
to be condemned and amended.
Any appeal to a God as an author to
justify such violence against another human being should be met with the
derision it clearly deserves.
In a society in this century being able to
be labeled as Gods enemies for demonstrating disagreement and therefore be able
to be killed is such a grotesque absurdity that I cannot but agree with the
following excerpt from the ‘Australian’30 June 2009 Christopher Hitchens:
“It is a mistake to assume that
ayatollahs, cynical and corrupt as they may be, are acting rationally. They are
frequently in the grip of archaic beliefs and fears that would make a stupefied
medieval European peasant seem mentally sturdy and resourceful by comparison.”
I believe Christopher is much too harsh on
the medieval European peasant.
I have faith from what I have seen that
the Iranian people are on their way out of this constitutional and societal citizenry
straight jacket. They should hand the straight jacket over to Khamenei, Ahmadinejad and the politicized Basij as soon as possible for all our
sakes.
“pure and clean image of the Islamic Republic in the world” There is not enough water in the world to
wash the stain of beautiful Neda Agha-Soltan’s blood from the
“pure and clean Islamic Republic” nor the blood of the other brave Iranians who
have sacrificed their lives for a better life in fact for us all. The Islamic
Republic was never clean and certainly never pure. It achieved its current form
through fear, violence, oppression and rabid indoctrination. The Islamic
Republic has been a myopic oppressive regime from start to its soon happily
awaited finish.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To Ayatollah Khamenei, Ahmadinejad, Guardians, politicized Basij,
Revolutionary Guard, Quds force, various religious leaders and followers in
Do
you not notice the only way you can maintain your vision of society is through
fear, violence and terror not reason. Do you not notice as you have not been
able to convince by reason, fear, violence and terror have become your
reason.
You
believe you represent Gods will on earth; you interpret a text to create a
society which requires fear, violence and terror not reason to maintain your
vision; you then export this fear, violence and terror to the rest of humanity
and call it Gods will. Have you ever reflected this is your own personal
interpretation from thoughts and text of what you think is a Gods vision which
can never be a Gods actual vision? Unless you actually believe yourselves to be
a God or Gods chosen one, which is clearly delusionary.
Do
you not notice the only way you can maintain your vision of society is to
create structures and processes to repress the true will of the people. Supreme
power, Guardians to restrict the different views of the people; Basij to
violently maintain the vision; a revolutionary guard (Quds force) to assist the
Basij in their heinous task internally and export these repressive structures
and processes externally.
Do
you not notice this vision ultimately requires the methods of violent
application against the people by these apparatus and processes to maintain
this vision? You again believe because it is a Gods will you do this and you
are Gods representative on earth. Have you not thought this is actually your
demented interpretation of what you think is a Gods version.
Have
you ever stopped to think in the quieter moments we all have in our lives you
may be in fact bereft of sanity if you believe your thoughts are actually
connected to a God; God authorizes you to do such diabolical acts against
humanity; you actually believe your design is Gods design on earth. If you do
all you are doing is making life totally unnecessarily a hell on earth for
fellow humanity and bereft of any justification...
I
have personally been through a rabid indoctrination process with Catholicism
and I understand some of you actually feel you have a connection with a God
which gives you the right to carry out this repression. Whilst you believe your
acts, which are totally repugnant to the rest of humanity, you regard as
actually saving human kind have you ever stopped to think in the quieter
moments we all at times have you are most totally mistaken. That you are in
fact perpetrators of the most repressive and heinous crimes known to God, human
or any other creature for that matter.
Your
‘Revolution’ was nothing more than a replacement of a repressive violent
Society in
To
say your heinous actions are justified by text is an edifice of your own
fabrication not Gods. If God has meant humanity to suffer from ignorance in a
life of fear, violence and terror without reason then you are certainly
achieving Gods will on earth. But I must point out it is only your personal
interpretation of Gods will and I therefore if you actually believe God is
directly guiding your judgment and actions you are clearly delusional and
require intensive therapy.
It
is your judgment and actions, your hand, your will alone driven by your own
interpretation of what you alone think is a Gods will which is causing grievous
injury to you fellow man. You alone are responsible for the misery. You alone
are responsible for shouting Death!! Death!!. Humans are totally responsible
for their actions which cannot be rationally excused by anyone’s interpretation
of what a God thinks. God is not responsible for your crimes against humanity.
Go
into a play ground alone sit quietly with small children playing around you and
reflect on the brutality, the societal structures and processes you will
eventually see them as an abomination. You cannot change the past but you can
change the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2 July 2009
Huge
Mistake Hassan Firouzabadi,
It is a
shame Huge
Mistake Hassan Firouzabadi has called it a ‘huge mistake’ to be
promoted as a “HUGE Mistake”. Why Huge Mistakes
promotion would affect the European Unions participation in Huge Mistake
talks on
Delusional
characteristics appear to be somewhat endemic in the elite of the Islamic
Republic. Must be all the fumes from polishing too many gun barrels and road
side bombs for the Quds Iraqi Shia death squads, Taliban, Hezbollah ,
politicized Basij … any variety of murderous killers.
“pure and
clean image of the Islamic Republic in the world” What a joke. If you say it often enough over
the screams of the thousands of victims maybe maybe..
No I am sorry the blood does not wash away that easily nor can the stench be
smothered by excessive flower arranging.
It appears
---------------------------------
The absurdity
of this statement – “Today our best criteria especially for our officials are
those based on religious democracy.”
(Islamic
Revolution Leader Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei: Internet site 3 July 2009)
The absurdity of this statement – there is not such
thing as a religious democracy.
It is a term dreamed up in an attempt to
unsuccessfully hide a religious autocracy. Full stop.
The powers inherent in the Iranian political system
have been purposefully created to nullify the peoples Democratic will through the
-supreme power of the ayatollah,
-the restrictive admission of difference into the so
called electoral process by the Guardians,
-the enforcement of the myopic views of a few with the
violent killers, the enforcing black shirted Basij. By the way have the Basij completed their societal
task of trashing Iranian neighbourhoods – intimidating women and children.
-and if any reinforcement of fear and violence was
needed the Revolutionary Guard with the ever lovable Quds force-With all the
murderous terrorists hangers on.
Call that a Democracy the delusion is palpable.
Religion inevitably overrides the Democratic will of
the people because of a select few, sometimes one erroneous personal
interpretation of a text to justify any form of inhumanity and repression of
the will of the people.
Democracy is not a subject of any limiting notion
religious or secular. A religious democracy is the same as saying rabbit horse
or dictatorship communism.
Democracy is the reflection of the will of all of the
people not a minority myopic personal view of maniacs imposing and exporting
their violent vision for humanity with fear, violence and terror. Yes we all
see the religious Democracy in action every day and we are sick of it.
Tranquillity supposedly to be achieved by the killing
of human beings. Family squabble who on earth are you kidding. Do families
generally go around shooting each other because they disagree? Grow up and join
civilisation in a way which promotes life rather than leaves it in shreds in
‘People with different tastes enjoy good relation
with system’. So the Basij are simply delivering flowers for the sick and
dying. The Revolutionary Guard are simply dropping leaflets of joy and good
will around the earth.
Reality has clearly separated itself from the mind of
the Iranian elite. It needs to for to face the reality of its actions, thinking
themselves
Top Reformers Admitted
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN
Published: July 3, 2009
Times Topics: IranReports on Iranian Web sites associated with prominent conservatives said that leading reformers have confessed to taking velvet revolution “training courses” outside the country. Alef, a Web site of a conservative member of Parliament, referred to a video of Mohammad Ali Abtahi, who served as vice president in the reform government of former President Mohammed Khatami, as showing that he tearfully “welcomed being defrocked and has confessed to provoking people, causing tension and creating media chaos.”
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s representative to the Revolutionary Guards, Mojtaba Zolnour, said in a speech Thursday that almost everyone now detained had confessed — raising the prospect that more confessions will be made public. Ayatollah Khamenei is supreme religious leader.
The government has made it a practice to publicize confessions from political prisoners held without charge or legal representation, often subjected to pressure tactics like sleep deprivation, solitary confinement and torture, according to human rights groups and former political prisoners. Human rights groups estimate that hundreds of people have been detained.
They fear the confessions are part of a concerted effort to
lay the groundwork for banning existing reformist political parties and
preventing any organized reform movement in the future. “They hope with this
scenario they can expunge them completely from the political process,” said Hadi Ghaemi, coordinator of
International Campaign for Human Rights in
The confessions are used to persuade a domestic audience that even cultural and academic outreach by some of the nation’s top academics is really cover to usher in a velvet revolution, human rights workers and former prisoners say.
“If they talk about the velvet revolution 24 hours a day people don’t care,” said Omid Memarian, a former Iranian journalist who was arrested and forced to issue his own confession in 2004. “But if reformers and journalists say they are involved in it, it makes the point for them. Once my interrogators said, ‘Whatever you say is worth 100 times more than having a conservative newspaper say the same thing.’ ”
In addition to Mr. Abtahi, other prominent reformers being held include Abdullah Ramezanzadeh, Mr. Khatami’s spokesman, and Mostafa Tajzadeh, a former deputy interior minister.
In 2007,
In 2001, Ali Afshari was arrested for his work as a student leader. He said he was held in solitary confinement for 335 days and resisted confessing for the first two months. But after two mock executions and a five-day stretch where his interrogators would not let him sleep, he said he eventually caved in.
“They tortured me, some beatings, sleep deprivation,
insults, psychological torture, standing me for several hours in front of a
wall, keeping me in solitary confinement for one year,” Mr. Afshari
said in an interview from his home in
The problem, he said, was that he was not sure what he was supposed to confess to. So over the next several months, he said, he and his interrogators “negotiated” what he would say — and, more ominously, whom he would implicate. Once his confession was complete, he said, he practiced it for 7 to 10 days, and then it ran on state-run television.
Three years later, Mr. Memarian, the journalist and blogger, was arrested in another security sweep. He said that his interrogator at first sought to humiliate him by forcing him to discuss details of his sex life, and that when he hesitated, the interrogator would grab his hair and smash his head against the wall. He said the interrogator asked him about prominent politicians he had interviewed, asked if they ever had affairs, and asked if he had ever slept with their wives.
“I was crying, I begged him, please do not ask me this,” said
Mr. Memarian, who is in exile now in the
The pressure was agonizing, he said, as he was forced to live in a small cell for 35 days with a light burning all the time and only three trips to the bathroom allowed every 24 hours. He was forced to shower in front of a camera, he said. At one point the interrogators threatened to break his fingers.
“They came up with names, and topics,” he said. “They gave me a three-page analysis and said read this and include it in your confession. My interrogator once said, ‘You have written seven years for the reformists; it’s O.K. to write for us for two months.’ ”
Mr. Memarian said that even in
2004, his interrogators were most interested in several leading reformers,
including Mr. Abtahi, who at the time was an adviser
to the president. When he was finally released, and after his confession was
published by
“Abtahi said, ‘We cannot guarantee anyone’s security,’ ” Mr. Memarian said. “ ‘We know what happened to you guys. When you leave this building we do not know will happen to you, or what can happen to us in this committee.’ ”
Leading
Clerics Defy Ayatollah on Disputed
By
MICHAEL SLACKMAN and NAZILA FATHI
Published:
July 4, 2009 New York Times
A
statement by the group, the Association of Researchers and Teachers of Qum,
represents a significant, if so far symbolic, setback for the government and
especially the authority of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whose word
is supposed to be final. The government has tried to paint the opposition and
its top presidential candidate, Mir Hussein Moussavi, as criminals and traitors, a strategy
that now becomes more difficult — if not impossible.
“This
crack in the clerical establishment, and the fact they are siding with the
people and Moussavi, in my view is the most historic
crack in the 30 years of the Islamic republic,” said Abbas Milani,
director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University.
“Remember, they are going against an election verified and sanctified by Khamenei.”
The
announcement came on a day when Mr. Moussavi released
documents detailing a campaign of fraud by the current president’s supporters,
and as a close associate of the supreme leader called Mr. Moussavi
and former President Mohammad Khatami
“foreign agents,” saying they should be treated as criminals.
The
documents, published on Mr. Moussavi’s Web site,
accused supporters of the president of printing more than 20 million extra
ballots before the vote and handing out cash bonuses to voters.
Since
the election, the bulk of the clerical establishment in the holy city of
With
its statement Saturday, the association of clerics — formed under the
leadership of the revolution’s founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah
Khomeini — came down squarely on the side of the reform movement.
The
association includes reformists, but Iranian political analysts describe it as
independent, and it did not support any candidate in the recent election.
The
group had earlier asked for the election to be nullified because so many
Iranians objected to the results, but it never directly challenged the
legitimacy of the government and, by extension, the supreme leader.
The
earlier statement also came before the election was certified by the country’s
religious leaders, who have since said that opposition to the results must
cease.
The
clerics’ decision to speak up again is not itself a turning point and could
fizzle under pressure from the state, which has continued to threaten its
critics. Some seminaries in
They
also retain the support of the powerful security forces and the elite Revolutionary
Guards. In addition, the country’s highest-ranking clerics have yet to
speak out individually against the election results.
But
the association’s latest statement does help Mr. Moussavi,
Mr. Khatami and a former speaker of Parliament, Mehdi Karroubi, who have been the
most vocal in calling the election illegitimate and who, in their attempts to
force change, have been hindered by the jailing of influential backers.
“The
significance is that even within the clergy, there are many who refuse to
recognize the legitimacy of the election results as announced by the supreme
leader,” said an Iranian political analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity
for fear of reprisal.
While
the government could continue vilifying the three opposition leaders, analysts
say it was highly unlikely that the leadership would use the same tactic
against the clerical establishment in
The
backing also came at a sensitive time for Mr. Moussavi,
because the accusations that he is a foreign agent ran in a newspaper, Kayhan, that has often been used to build cases against
critics of the government.
The
editorial was written by Hossein Shariatmadari, who
was picked by the supreme leader to run the newspaper.
The
clerics’ statement chastised the leadership for failing to adequately study
complaints of vote rigging and lashed out at the use of force in crushing huge
public protests.
It
even directly criticized the Guardian Council,
the powerful group of clerics charged with certifying elections.
“Is
it possible to consider the results of the election as legitimate by merely the
validation of the Guardian Council?” the association said.
Perhaps
more threatening to the supreme leader, the committee called on other clerics
to join the fight against the government’s refusal to adequately reconsider the
charges of voter fraud. The committee invoked powerful imagery, comparing the
20 protesters killed during demonstrations with the martyrs who died in the
early days of the revolution and the war with
The
statement was posted on the association’s Web site late Saturday and carried on
many other sites, including the Persian BBC, but it was impossible to
reach senior clerics in the group to independently confirm its veracity.
The
statement was issued after a meeting Mr. Moussavi had
with the committee 10 days ago and a decision by the Guardian Council to certify
the election and declare that all matters concerning the vote were closed.
But
the defiance has not ended.
With
heavy security on the streets, there is a forced calm. But each day, slowly,
another link falls from the chain of government control. Last week, in what
appeared a coordinated thrust, Mr. Moussavi, Mr. Karroubi and Mr. Khatami all
called the new government illegitimate. On Saturday, Mr. Milani
of Stanford said, former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani met with families of those who
had been arrested, another sign that he was working behind the scenes to keep
the issue alive.
“I
don’t ever remember in the 20 years of Khamenei’s rule where he was clearly and
categorically on one side and so many clergy were on the other side,” Mr. Milani said. “This might embolden other clergy to come
forward.”
The
committee of clergy was formed in the 1960s. Mr. Milani
said that for years, Ayatollah Khamenei also belonged to the group, and that it
had developed some political clout by backing successful candidates for
national office.
Many
of the accusations of fraud posted on Mr. Moussavi’s
Web site Saturday had been published before, but the report did give some more
specific charges.
For
instance, although the government had announced that two of the losing
presidential contenders had received relatively few votes in their hometowns,
the documents stated that some ballot boxes in those towns contained no votes
for the two men.
Michael Slackman reported from Cairo, and Nazila Fathi from
A group of clerics in
The pro-reform group's statement
pits it against the top legislative body, which last week formally endorsed the
re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
On Saturday, former
President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani said that
post-election events had caused bitterness.
Hundreds of thousands
of people took to the streets in the aftermath of the poll to protest at what
they alleged was a fraudulent election.
The protests died down
after the authorities deployed lethal force, killing at least 20 demonstrators.
More than 1,000 were arrested.
On Sunday, state news agency
Irna quoted
The authorities have
blamed the West, in particular the
The head of
'No authority'
The pro-reform clerics
group said in a statement that the top legislative body, the Guardian Council,
no longer had the right "to judge in this case."
In a statement to the
press, the Assembly of Qom Seminary Scholars and Researchers said some members
of the Guardian Council had "lost their impartial image in the eyes of the
public."
"How can one
accept the legitimacy of the election just because the Guardian Council says
so? Can one say that the government born out of the infringements is a
legitimate one," it said.
The Guardian Council is
an unelected 12-member council made up of six religious leaders, appointed by
the supreme leader, and six jurists.
The statement is
further proof of a split at the top of
They say that in
particular, it was an act of defiance against the country's supreme leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The group said the
Guardian Council had not paid "attention" to the complaints lodged by
the defeated candidates Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi
Karroubi, and urged other clerics to back them in
calling the election and the new government illegitimate.
On Saturday, Mr Rafsanjani
- an influential figure in Iranian politics and a prominent backer of Mr
Mousavi during the election - met with the families of some of those who have
been detained.
It was the first time
he had spoken publicly since the election. He told the families that nobody
with a "vigilant conscience" could be satisfied with the current
situation.
"I hope with good
management and wisdom the issues would be settled in the next days and the
situation could improve ... We should think about protecting the system's
long-term interests," Mr Rafsanjani said.
A BBC correspondent
said that Mr Rafsanjani appeared to be hinting that a process was going on
behind the scenes, which might resolve the current crisis.
Separately, one of the
two British embassy staff still in custody in
Nine Iranians employed
by the ambassador in
There was concern on
Friday when a senior Iranian cleric said some of them would be put on trial.
Mr Miliband
told the BBC that efforts were now focused on securing the release of the last
employee being held.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It is better to have lived a poor life well
than to have lived it poorly
We are told
by the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman some foreigners do not understand
Iranian society and it would seem some foreigners are therefore unable to draw
appropriate conclusions as to what is actually occurring in
It would
seem violent behavior and other matters in
So if my
lovely little dog was beaten with a baton on the streets of
I believe
like our little doggy friends human beings at their core enjoy and suffer life
in very much the same way.
We all know
when we are being taken advantage of.
We all know
when we are being lied to.
We all know
when someone beats us it is a violent act.
We all know
when people roam our neighborhoods terrorizing and beating up people they
dislike; going into houses and trashing them we feel very frightened and anger
at their powerlessness to stop the brutality.
We all know
when one journalist is arrested raped and killed by authorities that it is a
message to shut up for the rest of the media and society in general.
We all know
what it means when people disappear or are killed for objecting in a peaceful
manner.
We all know
when we stand up our families and friends are put at risk.
We all know
what equal opportunity in work and play means.
We all know
which side our bread is buttered on.
We all know
what corruption means
We all know
what it means when the Stasi, SS, and Revolutionary guard produce an
unfortunate person confessing all, incriminating all and blaming the evil
outsiders.
We all know
what a judicial public political trial means.
We all know
with a regime such as the one currently in
We all know
with life goes the inevitability of death.
We all know
the shouting of ‘Death to …’ is not only meant for the benefit of the actual
recipient of the curse. It is meant for all of us. Conform or be ready to die.
We all
know, no interpretation of any text secular or religious used to justify brutal
acts excuses them nor should the text be used to justify the protection of
those responsible for unleashing the brutality on the people.
We all know as my lovely son told me one day –
It is better to have lived a poor life well than to have lived it poorly.
_________________________________________________
‘As
so often in the course of history the shell of the institution remained, but
its contents and spirit changed’ Is this what happened to you the elite of
As
can be seen below, yes the cultural context may be used as an excuse and the
details of the processes may be different but the outcomes are still exactly
the same. Be it information control in Stalin
GOEBBELS AND NATIONALIST
SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA 1925-1945 - Directing The Press 90-89-
In
this chapter we shall consider some of the methods by which Goebbels’ Ministry
exercised this control. Special attention will be given to the system of
conferences and directives and to the peculiar mixture of criticism, threats
and occasional praise which made the life of the journalists, to say the least,
uneasy. At the same time it has to be realized that the control of the press by
the Propaganda Ministry could never be 100 per
cent, not because there was any organized resistance in the ranks of the
intimidated editors and journalists, but rather because of the frequent
interference by some other Party offices and officials, in fact, if not
nominally, beyond the control of the Propaganda Ministry.
The
Press Conferences and the directives conveyed to journalists at them were
important tools of control. Though conferences imposed on the journalists
tended to multiply in the Third Reich, the daily Press Conference, which took
place at noon and was later supplemented by a smaller one in the evening, remained
of paramount importance. Unlike the Propaganda Ministry, it was not a novel
feature introduced by the Hitler régime. It had existed before, but when the
National Socialist rulers took it over from the Republic in 1933 they changed
it gradually wail it only faintly resembled the original. As so often in the
course of history the shell of the institution remained, but its contents and
spirit changed.
Since
1919 the editors of the leading
By
the autumn of 1933 journalists could have little doubt that the Government
directives had to be regarded as binding even to the last detail. They were
told by the head of the press conference, Jahnke, that the Government was
determined to make editors, and particularly editors- in-chief, personally
responsible for any infringement of the directives.2 The journalists
present were not there only as representatives of their papers, but also,
conversely, as confidential agents of Minister Goebbels.5 From then
on the obligatory character of all directives and decrees of the Propaganda
Ministry was stressed repeatedly.4 Seasoned journalists soon realized that
their relative independence had gone. When a leading radio official, who had
found it difficult to readjust himself to the new régime, was sent on permanent
leave, the journalists at the daily Press Conference were warned that “it was
not a good thing to swim against the tide.”5
As with
the previous Government, information issued by the Press Department came within
three categories:
1) News for immediate publication, to be released in full to the press.
2) Information and material to be used indirectly without indicating the
source.
3) Strictly confidential directives which were only available to the journalists
admitted to the press conference and to the editor-in-chief or the sub-editor
responsible for a part of his paper (foreign affairs, economics, etc.) 6
….. etc more details available from the
book
1. Stephan, Joseph
Goebbels, p. 158.
2 At that time journalists at the Press Conference were worried because of the
severe measures taken against the chief editor and publisher of an
Letter by
4 For instance, at the press conference of 9 January,
1934 they were warned that in several cases directives had either been exceeded
or not followed. (Brammer Anweisung
No. 161, 9 January, 1934. There is a comment in handwriting in the margin
“important” [wichtigl).
5 “Bestellung” Press
Conference 1 July, 1933 (Brammer).
6W. Hagemann, Publizisrik im Drinen Reici, Hamburg, 1948,
pp. 316-317.
To Ahmadinejad
Khamenei with his pearly red teeth has taken a French citizen to
play with. Please ask Khamenei to be more careful given what
occurred with the last brave woman the amazing esteemed magician Iranian
Prosecutor General Saeed Mortazavi violently abused and killed, justified by a
demented interpretation of text.
I know you are working feverishly to save your skin and working
diligently on exit plans, one being the annihilation of the Planet. It appears
if you and Khamenei have to go you want to take us all with you. Something to
do with the pure and clean image of the Islamic
Republic in the world?
It is clear the Americans know you do not give up an opportunity
to strut the stage without some diabolical endeavour more pertinent to preserve
a discredited societal system at any cost to humanity.
Let us hope for all our sakes the premonitions do not come to
pass and Iranian cities are not encased ultimately in a green glowing
conflagration.
When the trumpet sound blankets heaven and earth, Michael and
Gabriel will find you ahmadinejad; you khamenei and you esteemed magician Iranian prosecutor
general saeed mortazavi
very easily amongst the multitude. Your very high expectations of adulation
will be crushed more severely than the innocent lives you have violently
destroyed.
For evil indelibly marks the soul and you will reap in much
greater measure the terror and violence you have sown.
For it is known in heaven and on earth the Death of others and
violent suppression of justified voices of opposition enables your sordid
tranquillity.
You cannot
change the past but you can change the future.
APPEARANCES ARE DECIEVING – WE SEE WHAT WE WANT TO SEE
All text ever created has been by humans for humans.
Is there anyone who can truly claim not the hand of a human but an actual hand
of God has physically written any of the text we see before us and hear today?
As the human hand has written or spoken are not
these movements driven by this humans own sinews not a Gods sinews. Is it not a
humans own nervous tissue which carries the impulses by which these sinews move
to enable the text and spoken word to be formed.
Do not the nervous impulses which move the sinews
to enable the text and spoken word to be formed derive from a humans own
thoughts, a pool of personal environment and context not a Gods personal
thoughts, environment and context.
If it is claimed God is a humans sinews; humans
thoughts; humans environment; humans context; and therefore is able to guide
directly a Gods thoughts without human embellishment into text and speech,
utilising the body of the human, how does another human distinguish between
text or speech derived from a God and a human when the text is seen clearly to
be written and spoken by a human?
Have you not noticed for any God based text we
firmly believe in there are thousands of contradictory God texts. As only one
of these contradictory texts may be true and there is clearly no infallible way
to distinguish between or prove which human author was truly guided directly by
God other than our own personal prejudice, what definitive bases do we have for
proving these other texts are invalid rather than simply contradictory.
If it is claimed God enabled miracles, visions,
persons rising from the dead, ascending into the sky to heaven, to prove the
text or derived spoken word was derived directly from God personally. How and
when did God communicate to humans that this was how God intended to
substantiate the text and spoken word?
If the only communication of Gods intention to substantiate the text was
in the human formed text itself how can the substantiation be substantiated?
In other words to say the text itself becomes
relevant only by claiming itself to be relevant is simply not enough to vouch
for authenticity other than again personal prejudice. Particularly when all the
claims of miracles, visions in the current day would not possibly be at all
taken on faith even by the people who claim today to believe without
question.
This is not to say I believe any one of us is
particularly wrong or right. I am just putting forward the notion that there
should be room left for the possibility of error so each of us do not take
ourselves so seriously that we continue to kill each other. To silence the
dissenting voices for the sake of an earthly sordid tranquillity only to find
the hereafter is nothing like we humans expected.
The pain, torment and grief inflicted on so much
humanity, for a singular view whatever that may be, a very harsh wasted effort
for no reward.
On reflection I simply cannot bring myself to
believe God is a God of the poetry of death and fear. A God so afraid of the
independent spirit of questioning minds and souls that God would kill Gods own creations
in the streets of
To me this murderous terror is man alone, God again
a slave to the illusion of myopic sycophants subservient to a human political
structure of sovereignty. Not honouring a God, honouring instead human flowers
of death and terror for the pursuit and retention of power at any cost.
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
The
following article is of no surprise to me or anyone who
understands oppressive regimes recognise each others guilt with rapturous
silence. Note in each case of violent internal reaction the elusive external
forces are to blame not the resident oppressive elite who see themselves
erroneously as the good guys whether the political system be comprised of
unaccountable religious or secular zealots. Therefore in the end result what is
the difference between these systems? – none.
Clerics Fault a Mute
By ROBERT F. WORTH
Published: July 13, 2009 9 New York Times
Related
2 Uighurs in Troubled
Region Killed by the Police (July 14, 2009)
Times Topics: UighursOne
of the clerics, Ayatollah Youssef Sanei,
a reformist, drew a sardonic parallel, suggesting that
“How could
Several Parliament members and a member of the Tehran
City Council have invoked the same comparison, Web sites reported. Although
some seem genuinely upset by the deaths of Muslim Uighurs
in western
A tense funeral for one protester, Sohrab Arabi, 19, was held Monday
in
Video of the funeral, in which dozens of people can
be seen holding his picture and chanting “God is great,” was posted on the
Internet. The funeral was closely monitored by the police, who warned the
family not to allow any protests or antigovernment chants, according to reports
by witnesses published on reformist Web sites.
The government has said 20 protesters have been
killed in all since the election, but opposition members say the number is much
higher, possibly in the hundreds. Hundreds of people have been arrested since
the election and held without charge. Some have been released, and it is not
clear how many remain in jail.
The arrests gave rise to several disparate forms of
protest on Monday. About 200 people staged a sit-in outside
The Association of Iranian Journalists released an
open letter to the leader of the judiciary protesting the punishment of people
who had merely exercised their right to free speech. The letter also called for
the detainees to be treated in accordance with
The wives of two prominent detainees issued open
letters on Monday urging the release of their husbands. The letters appear to
have been inspired by Mehdi Karroubi,
a reformist cleric and presidential candidate, who wrote one calling for
prisoners to be freed.
The letters may also be seen as safer than speaking
to reporters, an approach that landed several of the detainees in jail in the
first place.
Nazila Fathi contributed reporting from
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
Ahmadinejad vowed he would "slap the aggressor so hard they will lose
their way back home," AFP - Friday, July 17
It is better losing your way home
defending what is right than finding your way home with blood on your hands
violently defending a discredited dogma which can only survive by killing,
incarcerating dissenters and spreading terror and fear.
Such a dogma cannot
sustain itself though reason and therefore violence and fear becomes reason for
its delusional adherents.
For no citizen of
sound disposition would remain adherents to such a dogma for long if the
continual presence of the possibility of the application of grievous harm for
independent thought and action ceased to be.
The task you face
Ahmadinejad to realise the Ahmadinejad nightmare is the eradication of rational
logical thought. It is only then your irrational interpretation of text to justify
death and terror becomes plausible. Who are there left to dissent not even God?
This would in a
rational person normally raise a doubt as to the veracity of an intellectual
position. Doubt though is something you can no longer afford –it has gone to
far-there are too many victims now and many more to come.
The doubt is, a God
with such obvious intellect and power, no human being could claim to comprehend
other than an arrogant deluded human mind, has human beings write a text
containing a dogma which is so bereft of convincibility
it requires the institution of human terror and fear to spread and maintain its
acceptance as a Gods text. This is an absolutely ridiculous notion for it means
God lacks convincibility by Gods own word.
How could a Gods word
be so obscure to be unconvincing to the extent a God requires the terrible
death, terror and fear of the very humans God has so diligently created with
the ability to raise dissent against such an irrational dogma in the first
place.
There is absolutely
no rational logical support for such a violent interpretation of text other
than a humans own requirement to get what they want not what God wants.
If I believed God
was a God of death and subjugation then I could believe such an interpretation
but the vibrant life inherent in all things around me cries out in obvious
opposition to such a lie.
What is going to
bring Ahmadinejad and his cronies down and with them certainly not the Iranian
Nation which is so much more profound and secure than the Ahmadinejad tenure or
notions of life? Ahmadinejad it is your
own actions and excesses. Ahmadinejad you are the architect of your own demise
no internal or external force can match the determination your have for you own
self destruction. So it is with all tyrants. Tyrants dig their own graves
faster than any opposition could ever hope to achieve.
Ahmadinejad you have
no need to be afraid of the terror, bombs and bullets of other Nations
substantial fear of your lunacy. Ahmadinejad you need to fear the existence of
rational thought and growing awareness all that Ahmadinejad, Guardians,
Revolutionary Guard, Basij, Quds and Morality Police offer are terror, bombs
and bullets whilst Ahmadinejad and his brutish colleagues hide behind large
bowls of flowers whose perfume and beauty will not disguise the true state of
their souls whilst they all loudly rant the tyrants chorus –
Death to….! Death
to….! Death to ….! Death to….! Death
to….! Death to ….!
Of course
Ahmadinejad you will leave the slapping to your erstwhile thugs for you need to
build up from swatting flies and maybe up to the level of Morris dancing before
any slapping from your cowardly limp hands – just so long as your thugs hold
the victims down.
The Revolutionary
Guard, Basij and Quds are yet to realise courage is defending your fellow human
from unwarranted aggression the aim of which is to destroy Iranian peoples
right to self-determination as Iran faced with terrible invasion and tactics of
nerve and mustard gas by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq-Courage is not attacking your
own defenseless patriots on the street and in their houses of Iran to destroy
the Iranian peoples right to self-determination.
The Revolutionary Guard, Basij and Quds once hero’s
courageously protecting the Iranian people are now killing Iranian people and
instilling fear. If the Revolutionary Guard, Basij and Quds claim Iranian
people are secondary to Gods will, have the Revolutionary Guard, Basij and Quds
noticed who is defining Gods will in such a way, and asked Why, surely there are
other interpretations of text supportive of the aspirations of the Iranian
people, why did God create people in the first place-to live in constant fear,
you know it is wrong yet you persist, why are you afraid of saying so? Is it
courage sitting silent in the midst of infamy-you certainly did not do this in
the
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
Morality
Police realise their version of Morality is Police Station No. 109.
“The van is now painted with "Police Station
No. 109", instead of its usual markings identifying it as the
"Morality Police". The morality vans, which up until the time of the
protests were filled with police in charge of arresting women with
inappropriate Islamic dress, have now been put to a more compelling use by
local police stations tasked with arresting protesters.”
A woman sitting at the
foot of her car, in what seems to be an uncomfortable attempt at a picnic,
explains that she is waiting for her husband.
"He
was arrested 12 days ago," she says. "His only crime is that we live near
You cannot
change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by
enabling the independence of others first that we can realise our own true
independence.
MARTYR FOR IDIOCY or
TERROR THE LAST ASYLUM OF COWARDS
I believe the mealy
mouth approach of terrorist groups to what is or is not terrorism is simple
cowardice.
Let’s be clear
terrorists are persons who advocate and practice methods of partisan repression
and bloodshed, violent and intimidating methods to coerce communities to mouth
a point of view to enable a relative continuance of survival.
In every society
there are norms of behavior and belief enforced by varying degrees of
punishment either defined as a criminal code or social etiquette. The nature of
the enforcement defines us not the outcomes. It is the journey which is
important not the destination.
Apparently science
informs us significant mental energy is required to delve below the surface,
which is why we humans exist mostly as surface dwellers with our doubts
purposefully unresolved. I cannot claim myself to be anything other.
Yet surface dwelling
by terrorists becomes an art form of self-deception. Buoyed by the duplicitous
cowardly actions of terrorist masters hiding behind bowls of flowers unwilling
to sacrifice their own lives but enlivened by the sacrifice of gullible idiots
to the cause of death based on a lunatic text. It is known by its real name
MARTYR FOR IDIOCY not the MARTYR FOR GOD.
Any God of
credibility defines such a creature by its true nature – brutal, deluded
murdering human creature whatever the stupid text these deluded idiots and
masters try to use to substantiate their actions.
I believe the
duplicitous approach to what is or is not terrorism is simple cowardice. If the
message is of real worth to humanity the power of the word will be enough to
persuade acceptance and adherence. If not….. Reflective thought is required.
How can anyone
seriously believe a God would be so inept to create a text which cannot
convince by Gods word alone? To accept such a notion is to accept God is truly
unconvincing – how ridiculous.
There is no name
which can be applied to such creatures of evil. The only reference which may be
ascribed to such creatures are the deluded cast offs of a failed text. Able to
be sacrificed because a suicide bombers intellect and capabilities are not
regarded by their myopic masters as worthy of continuance. Rather than being
regarded as a hero of God suicide bombers are regarded as an idiot human able
to be sacrificed.
Why are suicide
bombers lauded loudly by their so called bothers, sisters and masters to undertake
and complete such a murderous act against humanity –it saves those other
bothers, sisters and masters having to do such a stupid thing themselves if the
so called bothers and sisters can get some other stupid idiot to do it. The
louder they shout in praise and jubilation of other Martyr Idiots they hope
they can enroll other idiots so they themselves will not have to make such a
stupid sacrifice for nothing but the loss of there own lives.
Placating bereaved
family members with ‘Sacrifice to Gods will. What a deception of horrendous
proportion. God could not care less – this is human evil not a Gods.
Terror the last
asylum of cowards – Jacobins included.
Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said
nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
IRANIAN
CLERIC SHEIK MANSOUR LEGHAEI’S LEGACY TO LUNACY.
Extracts from the
ASIO translation of Sheik Mansour Leghaei’s notebook
WITH WHOM SHOULD A
HOLY
WAR BE FOUGHT?
The enemies of Islam
are to be categorized under three headings:
1.
Infidels
who do not accept the Quran as the Book of Heaven.
2.
The
oppressive and unjust and whoever takes up arms against the Prophet.
3.
Heathens
living in Islamic countries who have broken the agreement to pay tribute to the
Moslems.
It is the Moslem’s basic duty to wipe out the above
classes.
OBJECTIVES OF DEFENSIVE HOLY WAR
…..Second, it is not necessary that each of the oppressors be guilty of
individual wrongdoings to be killed. If one individual from the group of
oppressors causes the martyrdom of a Moslem, it is right for the Moslems and
their leader to kill all the members of that group….
The trouble is there exist supposed human beings who
actually believe what is stated in Sheik Mansour Leghaei’s note book above
makes sense. These persons as we know are totally bereft of intellect but have
shown themselves to be potentially very dangerous to boot – basically because
of this clear lack of intellect.
These people believe firstly they are Moslems a fact
it appears some Moslems object to strongly as the notion of a basic duty to
wipe out anyone of any particular class or group of fellow human beings simply
does not conform with their interpretation of the same text.
Secondly these people believe a text written by man
and determined by other human beings to be a Book of Heaven authorizes them as
Moslems believers to kill other humans who:
Find the idea that a book written by humans then
touted as a Book of Heaven as totally unsubstantiated by anything of substance
other than you either believe or we kill you. – A very convincing argument if I
ever heard one. Though the rationality of the argument based on facts other
than the text says so simply is not proof.
Let us put this
madness into perspective to show how ridiculous such notions are:
WITH WHOM SHOULD A
HOLY
WAR BE FOUGHT?
The enemies of Tolkien are to be categorized under three headings:
4.
Elves
who do not accept the account of the Valar and Maiar according to the Lore of the Eldar.
5.
The
parking inspectors and soccer referees and whoever takes up cartooning against
the Wizard.
6.
Hobbits
that have refused to be blackmailed with the threat of violence to agree to pay
tribute for simply being
alive in their own country,
those who think for themselves, and anyone to big for their green boots, living
in Tolkien countries.
It is the Tolkiens basic duty to wipe out the above classes.
OBJECTIVES OF DEFENSIVE HOLY WAR
…..Second, it is not necessary that each of the parking inspectors be guilty of
individual wrongdoings to be killed. If one individual from the group of
parking inspectors causes a Tolkien to trip and knock their head, it is right for the Tolkiens and their noddy to kill all
the members of that group….
If I was to say I believed the above regards the Tolkiens-however old my text 10 minuets or 3000 years. Why
does no one take me seriously? The reason is – it is obviously a ridiculous
notion to accept – but if now a real possibility of being killed is thrown in
what happens to our perceptions?
The notion of killing is more to frighten the already
defined adherents than the ridiculers. This is because time and experience have
shown without the real ever present potential for violence against dissent
adherence will collapse.
The ridiculers outside also have to be silenced, as we
saw with Iranian regime virulently attacking outside commentators and cutting
off communication with the opposition in the outside world. For the ridiculers
point out the stark hypocrisy, bring working alternatives, and more importantly
show you can challenge the basis for the orthodoxy and confront directly the
dreaded authority who work by fear to achieve the tranquility of silence over
the bodies of the real martyrs who courageously resist this lunacy.
The above call for death of people simply because they
do not agree with an interpretation of text written by humans and claims it
came direct from a God would be laughable but for the many that have and will
continue to perish under horrible circumstances because certain maniac’s
delusional state has them believe the above diatribe to be true.
What century is this?
Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said
nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
|
Iranian vice-president 'sacked' or Religious Democracy in Action or Spot the difference |
||||||||||
Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has dismissed his most senior vice-president, it has been
reported. The decision, the
state news agency Ayatollah Khamenei
wrote to the president, telling him that appointing Mr Mashaie was
"against your interest and the interests of the government". Source BBC Saturday, 25 July 2009 Khamenei please drop the
word Democracy it’s becoming a joke-Supreme means what it means- Democracy
simply cannot exist in the same realm. Khamenei either
have a religious dictatorship or a Democracy you cannot have both. Clearly Khamenei
you have proved again you are the Supreme person – dictator – you are solely
dictating what is to occur in your Society so for heavens sake and honesty
delete Democracy from the dishonest Religious Democracy nomenclature. |
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
For those parents who have had a
daughter taken from them for perverse reasons of State know with a certainty
of nurturing life there is no God who will forgive State or man for such a
heinous act. Prepare for your Maker. |
||||||||||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said
nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
Although it is said the pen is mightier than the sword clearly
history shows the mightiest swords own the pens.
The reason the concept of Democracy has such value
is its underlying fundamental notion that it attempts to redress the balance
from political elites with the power to control to the individual citizen.
Reliable, untainted, and sufficient information is an essential key to this.
Clearly we still have some way to go to rid ourselves
of our inherited feudal command and control Government, institutions and policy
framework which are more concerned with promoting the interests of the elites
than those of the ‘ordinary citizen’ Whether or not they are based on religious
or secular myopic views for both are created for the same purpose. To create mechanisms of control for man by man for particular
elites.
The degree by which Democracy exists in reality is
dependant on the limits to the power of elites. There is no difference between
a Prime Minister with autocratic power and a Supreme religious leader with
autocratic power. These are not Democracies but simply dictatorships. Naming
without appropriate substance does not hide the reality from the citizen.
Do we want Societies were individual citizens
“who see everything, saw nothing, and said nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
Such a death is that of Neda Agha-Soltan.
It is a matter of record
in death and more so in the character of a death a person can leave a positive
indelible mark on the character of humanity.
I speak not of a
death of notoriety or abstracted terror perpetrated by suicide bombers who are
mere flashes in the consciousness of those who encourage their cowardly action
so they themselves will not have to do such a heinous stupid act.
Suicide bombers,
retched excuses for morality, prefer oblivion rather than face the reality of
their twisted black souls. Too gutless to stay and look squarely into the torn
wasted human lives before them. Lacking the ability to coherently argue a case
for justice –they and their handlers of death give none.
I speak of a death
which is defined by the lives which have been saved or enhanced rather than the
many numbers which have been so cruelly destroyed. A death defined by standing
against the tide of fear generated by bigotry and hate of independent thought
and vision.
This death does not
necessarily have to be physical though it could and possibly invariably
contributes to an early passing. A person can be slowly or quickly destroyed by
the nature of the repression which invariably follows actions of courage. One
sees it daily in the lives of the people willing to stand against the State,
Religious or Private apparatus.
Even in reporting
misdemeanors in so called Western Democracies it tends to come with a heavy
penalty let alone in more supposedly draconian societies.
Fear is a constant companion
in our societies today for the very same reasons as in the past. It may have
ameliorated to a degree in some societies with the recognition of what are
assumed rights of natural justice and societal mechanisms to try and counteract
more negative aspects of human nature, but never the less the fear remains.
This is because the fundamental societal structures are still the same. Based
on self not other; hierarchy of submission not equality of purpose.
The death we most
remember is the innocent singular death of courage and sacrifice which defines
the stark difference between what is intrinsically good and what is evil. It is
a death which is not about denigrating a version of the truth for its own sake
but drawing to attention the worthlessness of violence and the revelation of
its anathema to life and cogent reason
Such a death holds
any supportive textual interpretation of what life is,
its purpose or reason as void. Such a death is
that of Neda Agha-Soltan.
If not being
prepared to perpetrate such monstrous acts against humanity which cut short the
vibrant lives of our children is weakness then I am certain the God of life
would agree with Gods cogent creatures weakness is indeed a blessing not a
folly
Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said
nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can realise
our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
Is GOD a PSYCHOPATH or a SIMPLE MALIGNANT NARCISSIST?
PSYCHOPATH
Spotting
The psychopath is defined by an uninhibited gratification in criminal,
sexual, or aggressive impulses and the inability to learn from past mistakes.
Individuals with this disorder gain satisfaction through their antisocial
behavior and lack remorse for their actions
Lack of a conscience in conjunction with a weak ability to defer
gratification and/or control aggressive desires, often leads to antisocial
behaviors.
Psychopaths (and others on the pathological narcissism scale) low in social
cognition are more prone to violence against others, failure in occupational
settings, and problems maintaining relationships. All psychopaths differ in
their impulse control abilities, and overall desires. Psychopaths high in the
pathological narcissism scale are more equipped to succeed, but pathological
narcissism does not in any way guarantee success.
“WOMAN HAD 80 WOMEN RAPED THEN RECRUITED AS SUICIDE
BOMBERS”
It would appear recruiting suicide bombers is certainly a suitable
employment opportunity for psychopaths.
SIMPLE
MALIGNANT NARCISSIST Spotting
An absence of conscience, a psychological need for
power, and a sense of importance (grandiosity) are often symptomatic of
malignant narcissism. Pollock wrote: "The malignant narcissist is
presented as pathologically grandiose, lacking in conscience and behavioral
regulation with characteristic demonstrations of joyful cruelty and
sadism."[
Kernberg wrote that malignant narcissism can be differentiated from
psychopathy because of the malignant narcissists' capacity to internalize
"both aggressive and idealized superego precursors, leading to the
idealization of the aggressive, sadistic features of the pathological grandiose
self of these patients." According to Kernberg, the psychopaths' paranoid
stance against external influences makes them unwilling to internalize even the
values of the "aggressor," while malignant narcissists "have the
capacity to admire powerful people, and can depend on sadistic and powerful but
reliable parental images."
Malignant narcissists, in contrast to psychopaths, are also said to be
capable of developing "some identification with other powerful idealized
figures as part of a cohesive 'gang' ... which permits at least some loyalty
and good object relations to be internalized." Malignant narcissism is
highlighted as a key area when it comes to the study of mass, sexual, and
serial murder.
FAHRAD
TAJARI, SAID THAT 30 PEOPLE HAD DIED DURING LAST MONTH’S UNREST, NOT 20 AS
INITIALLY CLAIMED BY THE AUTHORITIES.
BUT OPPOSITION LEADER
MIR-HOSSEIN MOUSAVI, MR AHMADINEJAD'S CLOSEST ELECTION RIVAL, SAID IF ONE OF
THE PROTESTERS HAD DIED OF MENINGITIS, "HOW COME HIS TEETH WERE
BROKEN?"
I do hope the Islamic Society of Engineers do not prove themselves to be readily as recognisable as the once hero’s now Iranian oppressors the Revolutionary Guard, Basij and Quds.
GOD is definitely not a PSYCHOPATH or a SIMPLE MALIGNANT NARCISSIST but some human beings certainly
are.
Conscience
is an ability or a faculty that distinguishes whether
one's actions are right or wrong. It leads to feelings of remorse when a human
does things that go against his/her moral values, and
to feelings of rectitude or integrity when actions conform to moral values. It
is also often viewed as the attitude which informs moral judgment before an
action is performed.
What century
is this?
Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said
nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
Faith provides
secular and religious certainty.
The greater the certainty the greater the danger to
humanity.
Incoherence is not
a property of God it is a property of man.
The degree to which harm is promoted
in texts and/or used to facilitate its acceptance is a true measure of the
degree to which the text diverges from not only humanities notions of natural
justice but the notion of God as a being infinite in justice and goodness and
the basis of all logic and rationality.
Only fools with treacherous designs
against the peaceful coexistence of justified independent thought would promote
and justify grievous harm against fellow human beings simply because they are
of another race or creed, some of which may have peacefully raised objections
to or just showed no interest in a text.
God
is a Spirit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable, in his being, wisdom, power,
holiness, justice, goodness, and truth.
God has knowledge of all things.
God is a non-material personal being
self-conscious and self-determining.
God is everywhere.
God’s omniscience is all-inclusive.
God is omnipotence. God controls all the
power that is or can be.
God is infinite in justice and goodness. The
laws of reason are attributes of Gods character. God is the basis of all logic
and rationality.
God has a perfect consistency of character
throughout all eternity.
If the above is true as to the
nature of God the following simply cannot be true:
God controls whether or not a person believes or not believes. If they
are informed or uninformed it makes no difference.
Comment:
Therefore is it not God who has
created this disbelief in the word of God not man. Why should man whose ears
are closed to the supposed word of God be punished for Gods own act of sealing
mans ability to accept the textual truth in the first place?
If God is all knowledgeable,
infinite in his justice and the basis of all logic and rationality what has God
got to gain be such and exercise in futility. Is it justice, logical and
rational to make a person deaf, dumb and blind and then punish that person with
blazing hell fire because they did not respond in the appropriate manner? God
has therefore not enabled natural justice to enable this human being an
opportunity to deny or accept.
God is omniscient as well as
omnipotent. In other words God is everywhere, everything at every time, all
inclusive in power to create and control. God therefore not only creates an
individual person but knows in that creation the person will deny God’s own
existence. God then punishes the person for denying the textual delivery of a
human being by burning that person in hell. This type of text has clearly been
created by man to excuse other men acting badly towards other peoples who have
a justifiable right to disbelieve what is being communicated to them, a faculty
created by God in the first place.
More importantly this serves to
restrict logical and rational reflection by those proposing the validity of
such a text as to why these people rejecting the text are so adamant it is a
load of bunkum – God is responsible therefore these rejecters of the text
should be condemned and their words of rebuttal untrustworthy - I therefore do
not have to question my own beliefs.
Whatever the rational used to oppose
the text no matter how logical or rational can now be dismissed – how
convenient for the arrogant and disrespectful. Only fools would accept God as
unjust, illogical and irrational as reflected by such a text.
How can a God be so inept and
incoherent in purpose in transcripts of God’s own text that it remains so
unconvincing as to require either the threat of or actual grievous harm to be
visited upon human beings to maintain observance by adherents and punish those
who justifiably disbelieve or do not show the required level of observance to
the text.
Such a notion that a text straight
from God requires a notion of such a level of Grievous harm, mistrust and
condemnation to maintain and promote an authenticity of a God’s text against
fellow human beings, created by God in the first place, is an absurdity. If
Gods text is so riven to be incoherent by human transcription to even the most
humble of humans then God’s choice of transcribers is clearly suspect. To
accept such a notion clearly means God is inept as well as incoherent – this is
clearly impossible.
Therefore any text requiring the
menacing of fellow human beings simply because those humans do not understand
what is being purported to be a text of God is not from God but from man and
should be treated as such. Incoherence is not a property of God it is
definitely a property of man.
What century is this?
Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
So the violence against body and soul will continue.. continue… This is Religious Democracy.. the Religious
will always condem the democratic .. as they have always done in the past ..
the religious inquisition continues .. evil abounds.
Probe urged into
Mr Karroubi said if even one account were true, it would be a tragedy
A defeated opposition candidate in
In a letter to former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Mehdi Karroubi said senior officials had informed him of the "shameful behaviour" taking place.
Mr Karroubi wrote that both male and female detainees had been raped, with some suffering serious injuries.
He asked Mr Rafsanjani to consult the Supreme Leader about the allegations.
About 200 people arrested during the mass protests sparked by June's disputed election, which saw President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad re-elected by a wide margin, are still being detained.
'Brutality'
In the letter addressed to Mr Rafsanjani in his capacity as head of the Assembly of Experts, Mr Karroubi demanded an investigation into allegations that several detainees had been sexually assaulted.
"Some of those arrested [as a result] of the unrest claim that detained girls have been sexually assaulted with... brutality," he wrote.
"The young men in detention were also sexually assaulted in such a way that some are now suffering from depression and other physical and psychological problems, and are incapable of even leaving their homes," he added.
Mr Karroubi said that the people who had told him about the allegations of sexual assault held "sensitive positions".
"Even if one account is true, it would be a tragedy for the Islamic Republic… and it would whitewash the sins of many dictatorships, including that of the deposed Shah," he added.
On Thursday, police confirmed serious rights violations had taken place at the Kahrizak detention centre, where most of those arrested at the protests were sent.
The head of Kahrizak was sacked and jailed on Sunday along with three of his guards, who were found to have beaten detainees.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ordered the closure of the centre in July, because it had failed to "preserve the rights of detainees". Police officials have admitted that some of those held since June might have been tortured.
Earlier on Sunday, a senior commander of
"If Mousavi, Karroubi and [former president Mohammad] Khatami are the main suspects behind the soft revolution in Iran, which they are, we expect the judiciary... to go after them, arrest them, put them on trial and punish them," Yadollah Javan told the Irna news agency.
Foreign media, including the BBC, have been restricted in
their coverage of
Is it arrogant and
disrespectful to point out a stark reality as apposed to
a tranquil delusion
of reason?
Grievous Harm as the
basis of law and precedent utilizing Gods divine right as its author’s rock of
proven existence in truth is a lie. The Devine right of God has and continues
to be utilized by man for the terrible repression and excuse for any number of
crimes against fellow human beings.
There is no
difference in the reasoned application of torture by the Catholics Spanish
inquisition and the
It is Gods will they
say as the bodies of the burning, tortured, raped and bloodied lie at their
feet. These perpetrators of devastation accuse the brutally destroyed of denying
the validity of a Gods text.
Any text which
justifies the application of Grievous Harm to enforce Gods tenants is a text of
man not God. For a text which justifies the application of Grievous Harm to be
a text of God means Gods own word fails to convince by its own power. Therefore
God by Gods own word lacks the power to convince even humanity of the
justification of the application of Gods owns tenants. God cannot lack power. This
means a God derived from such a violent text cannot be God but is man again pretending
to represent Gods word for mans own purpose.
For a text to be
truly a text of God it has to convince by the power of its word alone. Not
through the application of fear and impending death but through the rationality
and its clarity of reasoned text. For God is reason and clarity. The existence
of the Revolutionary Guard, the guardians, the Basij, the morality police, a
supreme leader are instruments of forced adherence not of reason, rationality
and clarity.
The reason these Iranian
apparatuses of State exist in the way they do and why they are repressive and
violent in their nature is that the proponents of Iran’s Religious Democracy
know in their hearts their interpretation of the text presents a God unable to
be sustained to a majority of humanity, let alone the Iranian people, as a lucid
and rational God.
Clearly God is
rational and lucid and therefore the existence of the Revolutionary Guard, the
guardians, the Basij, the morality police, a supreme leader proves the
supporters of the Iranian Religious Democracy and the framers of the Iranian constitution
know their interpretation of Gods text alone does not convince by the power of
their words alone. Therefore as their text does not universally convince those
who hear and read their text it cannot be derived from God it is from man for
mans purpose not Gods.
Such texts of clear
unreasoned promoted violence against those who differ on not only the text but
reject it completely as a word of God are not derived from God but man.
For
Is it arrogant and
disrespectful to point out a stark reality as apposed to a tranquil delusion of
reason for the brutal malady currently being suffered by the Iranian people and
many beyond its borders? The trouble is history shows clearly oppression is its
own incubator for more evil to come – internal and external to
Do we want Societies were individual
citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said nothing”?
It is only by enabling the independence of
others first that we can realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the
degree of independence we are willing to grant each other.
Faith provides secular and religious certainty, the greater the certainty
the greater the danger to humanity.
Incoherence is not a property of God it is
a property of man.
God neither demands nor forces adherence,
man does for mans objectives not Gods.
You cannot change the past but you can
change the future.
WHO AM I
I am who I think I
am.
I am defined by the
wind and sun.
Born of this earth
to return to it.
Knowing no more or
less of what I am or will be either at the start or end.
I claim to be
unique, with an understanding of life to match, yet I am the sum of all I have
heard, seen and felt – a variance of an inherited image.
It is by chance I believe
what I do not understand.
Doubt is my torment
and salvation.
I am a cognizant
human therefore a hypocrite.
I seek nothing but
peace and perseverance to enable discovery rather than to be led blindly down a
path of bloodied figure prints.
Freedom is an
illusion, despite our best endeavors it is only the degree of independence
enabled by others which create our opportunities for growth of character,
intellect and happiness.
Enabling the
independence of others first is my purpose.
Subjugating others
first to a single thought of unquestioning subservience to sovereignty my
anathema.
Friendship and
Family under a clear blue sky, accepting difference with understanding is all I
wish for others and myself.
I attempt to
convince by the power of my words not by my capacity to inflict unfathomable
torment upon mothers of every creed with torn aspirations, souls and bodies of
their daughters and sons.
I am you, you are I.
Do we want
Societies were individual citizens “who see everything, saw nothing, and said
nothing”?
You cannot change the past but you can change the future.
It is only by enabling the independence of others first that we can
realise our own true independence.
There is no such thing as freedom only the degree of independence we are
willing to grant each other.
Faith provides secular and religious certainty, the
greater the certainty the greater the danger to humanity.
Incoherence is
not a property of God it is a property of man.
DEBATE:Is the
future of
The future of Iranian citizen will be the same as that
of the Spanish citizen under the Spanish Inquisition.
The repression of the Iranian citizen will continue as
long as the enforcers the Revolutionary Guard, Basij, and morality police are
willing to impose Iranian elite’s ideology on the rest of the population.
DEBATE:Is the
future of
Khamenei refers to arrogance; Ahmadinejad refers to
disrespect-a device to avoid rationalising the
discrepancy between declarations of the existence of Democracy in
A "golden page" more like
a “bloody page” in
Yardstick of Democracy,
Religious Democracy – Rabbit Goose makes as much
sense.
DEBATE:Is the
future of
Ayatollah Khamenei's future is tied only to the
attitude of the enforces of the Iranian elites ideology
the Revolutionary Guard, erstwhile Baij and morality
police and not at all to Mr Ahmadinejad.
Ayatollah Khamenei's survival depends solely on the
enforcers remaining faithful to oppressing their fellow Iranian citizens.
Poor Mr Ahmadinejad has no
where to run, no where to hide when the true feelings
of the Iranian people in time inevitably force an unravelling
of the Iranian regime.
DEBATE:What next for
1
2 Increased resources for Basiji .
3 Reporting on fellow citizens
increases.
4 Surveillance of electronic media.
5 Forced public confessions.
6 Export of terrorism to destabilise
Democracies.
7 Killings judicial-other of opposition
commentators internal and external to
8 Trust of State apparatus, judiciary, religious leaders diminishes rapidly.
9 Pressure builds for constitutional change.
DEBATE:What next for
The inevitable public confessions of guilt and
connivance with enemies of
No doubt to be closely followed by Show trials of poor
Iranian unfortunates.
We again sit and watch - the acceptance of the notion
of sovereignty condemns citizens again to suppression without the possibility
of assistance.
What century is this?
DEBATE:What next for
:Iranian's must now realise the divine right of a Shar
violently imposing views on and killing citizens in the process for voicing
contrary views to a ruler is not different from the divine right of an
Ayatollah violently imposing his views on and killing citizens in the process
for contrary views to a ruler.
Also any text either secular or religious used to
justify grievous harm to Iranians for demonstrating a differing view is a
dangerous absurdity and should be challenged and altered.
:What next for
Reply to 'sleep tight'
There was a not so subtle threat against commentators
against the Iranian regimes actions on the previous BBC Iran discussion board.
It is the promotion of independance
against the suppression of it based on secular or religious archaic text which
encourages us in the face of chants of 'Death to ...' and possible harm,
"law or no law".
To believe any text authorises
grievous harm for simply expressing disagreement is a grotesque absurdity which
requires remedy.
DEBATE:What have
Roll UP
The Islamic version of the Catholic Spanish
Inquisition the Iranian Revolutionary Guard is about to do a repeat performance
of an old favourite, a version of the Spanish
Inquisitions proof that the Earth is indeed flat.
The Iranian Revolutionary Guard will also prove what
is an equally valid proposition Evil European, Israeli and US agents are
totally responsible for fomenting the huge demonstrations and violence in
See Usual Confessions of Guilt!
What Century is this?
DEBATE:What have
I congratulate the Iran's Revolutionary Guard for its diligence
and courage in arresting who every one knows as the perpetrators of the bloody
violence in Iran - the Royal twins Ayatohlah Khamenei
and President truism Ahmadinejad the only true contenders.
I am not surprised both have been also caught plotting
with
Well done 'Good Guys'!
DEBATE:What have
I to immediately thought of
an Iranian connection to the massive bomb blast in
Why would Iranian elite do this against their own Shia
brethren? Shia in
In my view the Iranian elite need:
to
manufacture a mentality of siege against Shia religion adherents,
to justify
arming
to destroy
a fledging Democracy on their door steps,
to send a
message of how ruthless they are and can be.
DEBATE:What have
US Agents in
Most countries have agents insinuated in other
countries.
So given
I must point out there is very little evidence of club
wielding bikers wearing US flags attacking Iranians in the streets of Iran's
cities.
Nor
DEBATE:What have
Thank you BBC and
I believe it is no coincidence
Free speech;
the ability
to propose a differing point of view,
the ability
to propose a different way of living in harmony
is an
anathema to such a suppressive, myopic religious regime as currently exists in
'Death to...'! is the only
response for a justified desire for independence from an oppressive dogma.
Thanks
DEBATE:What have
The winner is
Congratulations
Particularly entranced by those bikies battering pedestrians. It
looked so authentic.
Khamenei did not mention to ‘the most evil act’ of
all, the killing of fellow human beings by his Basij volunteer militia.
Being all powerful Fiction or Fact who cares?
DEBATE:What have
We would not cheat
Is Ayatollah Khamenei referring to himself or the Royal
Union Ayatollah Khamenei and Mr Ahmadinejad, the
esteemed erstwhile President of historical truism?
Ayatollah Khamenei is not unbiased. He openly supports
President Ahmadinejad, saying the president's views on foreign affairs and
social issues were close to his.
So much for objectivity of office.
It would seem the apparatus of State may have been utilised to enhance a particular vision. Cheating MOI!?