As with Life a work
in progress:
Foundation
Text=Ethics=Ideas=Motivation=Actions For and Against Other.
Cognizant human
beings are formed and deformed by Foundation text. Change the Foundation Text
or Change Nothing.
"Decision
theorists and cognitive scientists have recorded instances where individuals
refuse to change their mental models even in the face of irrefutable evidence,
because of the institutional support their unsatisfactory mental models get
from peers and society at large."
Religious
Trauma Syndrome: An Overview of Dr. Marlene Winell’s
Article in the British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive
Psychotherapies December 3, 2011 By Mriana
The Simple Answer to Ending the
Terror - Plato Knew it years Ago Why have we not Understood?
“Why us?” he cried amongst the carnage.
FRIDAY,
JANUARY 20, 2012
Very brave Indonesian/Earth Man drowning in a sea of Idiots.
‘God
Does Not Exist’ Comment Ends Badly for Indonesia Man Camelia Pasandaran January 19, 2012
No
Need to Believe: Indonesia's Atheists Marcel
Thee January 18, 2012
Very brave Man drowning in a sea of Idiots.
OK I will – I will 'Prove God Does Not Exist' – not hard at all.
Then you will let him live?
002.256 Let there be no
compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error:
Yes Truth does so let him go in peace this is his faith his religion. Islam a religion of Peace or Certainty?
OK
I will – I will 'Prove God Does Not Exist' – not hard at all.
Extract:
“My proof is the notion God is a textual construct only, which has no evidence
other Mans assertion it is true - i.e. that the existence of God merely by Man
saying it is true through tawdry Revelations from Man himself is not proof of
the existence of God. That is my assertion based on the following logic.
It is rather ridiculous to ask me to prove another Mans assertion that a bucket
is in a corner where clearly it is not visible and only exists as a revelation
in a Mans mind which Man writes down in text as proof it does. And further Man himself ..”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvXFsPjKrTQ
Religious
Trauma Syndrome: An Overview of Dr. Marlene Winell’s
Article in the British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive
Psychotherapies December 3, 2011 By Mriana
The Simple Answer to Ending the
Terror - Plato Knew it years Ago Why have we not Understood?
May I be so bold as to demand this very brave
Indonesian/Earth Man (Alexander) drowning in a sea of Idiots be thrown a
lifeline?
Please contact the following to inform them you
believe Truth should not be subverted to ignorance and violent superstition.
And the very brave Indonesian/Earth Man (Alexander) must be set free
immediately and provided with the level of security and employment required to
enable Alexander to continue his good work.
Regional Development Planning Board Provincial
Government of DKI Jakarta
Email: kontak@bapedadki.net
Attention: Sarwo Handhayani
The Captains Directly Responsible
for the Oh So Rickety Religion of Certainty leaking Boat. As so many
they have allowed to leave their shores with the help
of their Military or is that the Badan Intelijen Negara? Let us hope they do not all fortuitously
trip over into the life raft and leave
this intelligent man Alexander to his ignominious fate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marsekal TNI (Purn)
Djoko Suyanto |
Ir. Hatta Rajasa |
Dr.
H.R. Agung Laksono |
FRIDAY,
JANUARY 13, 2012
OUR
ONE PLUS ONE INTERVIEWEE IS AN EXPERT ON ENABLING 'PERMANENT TERROR
One
Plus One - David Kilcullen
the only success is failure
At what point would you have intervened to stop Hitler, Japan, Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, Vlad III,
Hutu, Gaddafi,.... - Not Humanities problem, not my problem - a local
issue - best left to locals - ignores what? - could it be a severe imbalance of
power of one interest group over an other?
What do you say to the Jew in the Death camp and the Russian in the Gulag who
both looked to the horizon and stated they did not care if they died in the
process but where was the rest of Humanity surely it was obvious they
were deserving of at least the attempt of saving from tyranny?
The Arab Spring has really resulted and is resulting in what change more a
winter than spring as the Religions of Certainty move to impose even
harder chains. The fact is also what your argument precludes are the
underlying dogmas from western philosophy as to the status of
a citizen was the driving force for change - the
stark relative difference in regards independence of a citizen
and the accountability of its rulers and the systems they manage. I
did not hear initially on the streets - 'More Religious Control, Greater
Diminished women Rights, ...
Nobel
Laureate Drops Bid for Presidency of Egypt NYT
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK Published: January 14, 2012
Muslim
Brotherhood picks new parliament speaker From
Mohamed Fadel Fahmy, For
CNN January 17, 2012
Arab winter more like it.
Your job is to find excuses - what the Noble Laureate is saying is nothing new
- the point is what happens afterwards with a local solution based on the same
foundation text. What happens when the bloodied victims
are mollified with 'We have heard' and
different names and even the same names with exactly the same Foundation text
against Other drives the outcome of the 'revolution'. Yes you may
have saved money and even lives in the short term but the trouble is it will
have to happen all over again.
Non-intervention the best policy - You fail to point out in the case
of Libya the so called spring where we now have x
Al-Qaeda operatives actually in control of
the Libyan military could clearly not have occurred unless
France came over the horizon - which if you did not notice was an external
military intervention.
What you also fail to mention regards Iraq is the blatant
intervention of an external State(s) whose absence from the field clearly in
both Iraq and Afghanistan would have enabled a significantly
improved environment for the development of Democratic institutions -
what pray tell is the underlying foundation text driving this terror
internal and external?
You can draw a circle on the sand and say there you are - localized -
but that clearly does not stop the tide - the reality - external forces - be
they military, terror, economic, philosophical or otherwise - in a
real world - are the major determinants in the final outcome - because borders
are nothing more than a line in the sand not impermeable.
You have created a simplistic convenience store
of conscience salving products to enable looking the Otherway or not looking at all - nothing more - as the
moderates and terrorists themselves have which enables them to carry
out low and high level atrocities against humanity- if you care to look
in their own convenience store of foundation text.
David Kilcullen the only success is failure - and you
get paid for it - trouble is not taking out the root means what - yes a 100%
chance of continuing Muslim terror attacks.
The 'success' of your strategy is to suppress high profile attacks and present
this as victory whilst the critical mass to enable the continuance of
'permanent terror' is reached and enhanced - Thanks for your
valuable expertise - Al-Qaeda was never the problem, just one of the many
symptoms, its the Foundation text which created
Al-Qaeda and creates each new generation of Muslim terrorists,
moderate or extremist, under whatever name they choose or is chosen for
them.
To infer the diminishing following of Al-Qaeda indicates
success given increasing Muslim terrorism around the world even by
States is self-serving to say the least and wrong.
AL-QAEDA
OVERRUNS TOWN NEAR YEMEN CAPITAL AFP
January 17, 2012, 6:10 am mmmm
David Kilcullen - Success in Iraq - what a joke -
tactics yes but the overall strategy has failed - all that was
provided was a smokescreen for withdrawal and failure.
The only thing we agree on is there is a 100% chance of a Muslim terror attack
but not only in the so called West - even dare I
say in Indonesia.
To say the assistance to Indonesia to combat terror in terms of the
international community seeking to improve their intelligence, police, and
justice services, whilst at the same time providing actual educational support
for the very same dogma which is the actual cause of the
Islamic terror in the first place has been successful - beggars
belief . The UN 2011 Human Rights report ring any bells - duffer.
Jakarta Globe: Just a few days news-
‘God
Does Not Exist’ Comment Ends Badly for Indonesia Man Camelia
Pasandaran January 19, 2012
Madura
Shiites Report More Threats Since Going Home Anita
Rachman January 18, 2012
Shiites
Still Under Threat in E. Java: Lawyer January
18, 2012
House
Members’ Yasmin Mission Hit by Islamists Vento
Saudale & Markus Junianto
Sihaloho January 15, 2012
Waiting
for Justice for Bogor, Bekasi Churches Camelia
Pasandaran January 12, 2012
Police
Fail to Act Against FPI After Attack on Ministry Ronna
Nirmala January 14, 2012
Indonesia
Police Target Girls for Wearing Shorts Jakarta
Globe January 12, 2012
Tangerang Police Criticized for Targeting
Women Instead of Perpetrators Keyko
Ranti Ramadhani January 13,
2012
Government
Threatens to Freeze Hard-Line Islamic Groups After Ministry Attacked Camelia
Pasandaran January 12, 2012
"Few members of the group, often
condemned as a group of thugs, ever face charges for their often violent
stand-over tactics. The few that have only receive light sentences."
etc:
Improving intelligence, police, and justice services can only ever be a short
term bandaid, feel good solution. The assistance directly to
an organisation whose dogma is completely counter to
Democratic principles will, has achieved what, not only now but historically?
Historically to what purpose will these more efficient services
be utilized given the State is
being progressively subverted to the dictates of a Religion of Certainty
as it has in Other countries. Do I need to name them?
To claim this strategy has 'worked' solely on the basis there has been no
large scale terrorist attack in Indonesia blatantly ignores the fact so called low level intimidation and violent attacks against
Other - even deaths as detailed by the 2011 UN Human Rights report are clearly
shown to be on the increase.
The fact is Indonesian Islamic fundamentalism is on the rise, the
reason being the same as the rise of Jewish fundamentalism in Israel, support
from the State, and grotesquely in regards Islam in Indonesia in
large part by the Labor Government, and what the interviewee fails to point out
without the existence of the so called moderates there would be
no extremists.
The challenge I set for this terrorism expert is where does the line
between the moderate and the extremist start and finish? Is the
Foundation Text upon which both base their ethics and therefore subsequent
actions against or for Other different? Does an
extremist actually see themselves as extreme?
This bullshit saying Terror is a policing matter, simply a crime against the
state, is the same as saying alcoholism is simply a sickness treat
the outcome, clean up the vomit, lock them in a cell for the night and
not recognize the cause alcohol.
We do recognize the cause of the Nazi, recognize the
foundation text, recognize actions derived from this foundation text
which clearly defines Other as less is a base cause of the ethics, ideas and
motivation for its adherents and Society acts accordingly in setting
up mechanisms inter-personal and judicial to clearly send a
message - unacceptable - therefore preventing Nazi ideology taking
hold.
Why not Islam - the construct and outcomes against Other
are exactly the same with the subjugation of women to be tilth when and where
men require - wake up you idiot interviewee.
To simply praise the grotesque enabler of generating the
critical mass for greater subjugation of women
and terror against Other beggars belief.
So what you ameliorate Muslim terror at the high end but enable
increased localize terror as the UN report indicates by supporting
the increased acceptance of Islamic dogma across a Society and
its imposition because you have supplied the finance to do so.
What the hell do you think those Indonesian soldiers where
doing assisting with the recent refugee boats, or for that matter the
Indonesian General supposedly involved in organizing the boats
- the fact is we have Iranians, from a State which we are in essence at
war with, crossing into our borders with the Iranian State refusing to take
them back - your telling me none of these masked in this process are not
an imminent threat to Australian security. Now there is talk of
letting those who have had their refugee status rejected
be released into the community - this can only lead to and even worse security threat to Australia. What is
the deterrence - there is now none.
Refugee
drownings reveal mistreatment and military
involvement Australian Broadcasting Corporation Broadcast:
17/01/2012 Reporter: Matt Brown mmm your x-military
why would a military of a country -so called friend be involved?
Talking to the Taliban is exactly the same as talking to Hitler as it is
helping financially Islam to take over the
Indonesian politic. You really think an Islamic state
on Australians border is not a threat? I am already seeing signs of
an attempt to social engineer Australia towards Islam. Australians should be
made aware if there is an attempt to do so.
Reporter
Dies in Pakistan, and Taliban Warn Others By
DECLAN WALSH Published: January 18, 2012
Locals does not matter who they are as long as we can wash our hands - out
black spot - not even ajax is going to get rid of
this one. 'Funny' was it not the Taliban demanding 'Freedom of The Press' so
they could have their terror attacks broadcast live - guess the
Taliban definition of what 'Freedom' means in practice is
very different than what? And if in this case what about every
other?
Your figures might look good but its the figures
underneath the growing or diminishing influence of Islam which is the key
indicator as well as the data as the UN points out increased oppression of
Other which is in essence terror but not as headline catching but much more
dangerous to any Democratic States interests- you want to know what
is going to happen to Australia if you idiots who have
this absurd policy notion you take out the thorn you will get a nice
lick rather than be eaten alive - better start realizing the nature
of the response depend solely on the nature of the beast - which is
defined by what in human terms?
Its the foundation text idiot change it or change
nothing the terror continues. This was never a criminal problem it is a dogma
problem, a flawed foundation text which vilifies Other
and qualifies and overwhelms any statement regards allowing Other to live
peacefully.
I can understand the Labor Government paying you for such drivel to
support their flawed policy but I will be very displeased if ASIO and any of
our Intelligence services have done so as well.
Yes fundamental societal paradigms will have to be overturned to stop
the terror - yes it will be hard and there will be a violent response -
the foundation text dictates it - but the fact is there is no such thing as
freedom of anything - otherwise we all would indeed be free of terror, high or
low level.
In your study of Indonesian insurgency what of the communist dogma - Where is
it? Why is it not prevalent? If the communist dogma was financed and
supported by the State what would occur? Would the political impact against Other diminish or increase?
Yes the fear is justified but the silence as to the actual cause of the terror
and what is required to stop it is not.
Israelis
Facing a Seismic Rift Over Role of Women NYT
By ETHAN BRONNER and ISABEL KERSHNER Published:
January 14, 2012
Think the above link is unrelated - Oh dear.
Religious
Trauma Syndrome: An Overview of Dr. Marlene Winell’s
Article in the British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive
Psychotherapies December
3, 2011 By Mriana
The Simple Answer to Ending the
Terror - Plato Knew it years Ago Why have we not Understood?
WEDNESDAY,
DECEMBER 14, 2011
BROWN SHIRTS & BLACK SKIRTS - IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?
This is about reality, the direct correlation between
the mere existence of foundation text vilifying Other
and actual subjugation and violence against Other.
This is not simply academic,
the existence of such text against Other diminishes the happiness and
independence of the individual citizen and leads inexorably to genocide and
particularly the increased subjugation of women.
Any so called ‘good’ person advocating such persons
adhering to such foundation text which contains such vilification be allowed
continue to do so without being held accountable, be it under the notions of
Multiculturalism, cultural relativism, or under the absurd notion simply by
having combined barbeques and
sporting fixtures every thing will be
OK had better grow up and understand once these
cultures of Certainty have enough critical mass there will be genocide.
There are absurd notions being put forward that
Religion is not political and any negative societal act which can be clearly
shown as being justified and promoted by religious foundation text should be
treated simply as a civil matter without addressing the root cause of evil
against Other the foundation text itself. Also the
notion ‘words are only words, writings are only writings..’
which is clearly not the case as the results on the ground show = communication
be it words or writing are not benign. As well because not every adherent is
involved in violence or teaching their daughters they should be subject to Mans
determination everything is OK – well it is not – by looking the other way we
are condemning new citizens and even the rest of society to what – growing
subjugation of women and further entrenchment of terror.
THE QUESTION TO ASK YOURSELF BASED ON FOUNDATION
TEXT 'ARE THESE CLOTHS WORN BY RESPECTIVE ADHERENTS PUBLISING THEIR
ADHERENCE TO EXACTLY THE SAME CONSTRUCT OF OTHER AND IF SO
SHOULD NOT BOTH SETS OF ADHERENTS BE REGARDED AND TREATED IN THE SAME
MANNER?
IF NOT WHY NOT? BE IT ONE REGARDED AS SECULAR (even
though one could argue the notions regards Other are
in the main directly sourced from religion) OR THE OTHER RELIGIOUS? This
not bigotry this is fact foundation text kills.
The proof: Why psychologists, psychiatrists,
childhood educationalist are so silent is a clear failure of courage.
There is justified fear the foundation text makes sure of that (Fears held for Christian convert The
Age Barney Zwartz January
11, 2012) but there is no justification for the
silence.
|
|
|||
|
Brown
Shirts |
Black
Skirts |
||
|
Hitler MEIN KAMPF ''How futile
it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their very
mouths distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and
adopting them again a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the
argument!” Hitler’s views as to the nature of Other: Genocidal Outcomes The Denial - "Who us, we would never harm Other see in our
Foundation text we say...." Next sentence: And before, what is said, what is written? What has happened? Is not there even a hint of correlation? And if so? How many Nazi considered themselves as
Moderate? As the extremist and the Moderates ethics are derived from exactly
the same text are they really? At what
point are they moderate or extremist? Would/Could one exist without the
other? |
Mohammed QURAN 006.049 But those who reject
our signs,- them shall punishment touch, for that
they ceased not from transgressing. etc Genocidal Outcomes (Noting the following are only a small list of
examples derived from one State politic) The 2002
Indonesian Island of Bali bombings killing
202 people etc The Denial - "Who us, we would never harm Other see in our
Foundation text we say...." Muslims: Mohhammed And before, what is said, what is written? What has happened? Is not there even a hint of correlation? And if so? How many Nazi considered themselves as
Moderate? As the extremist and the Moderates ethics are derived from exactly
the same text are they really? At what point are they moderate or extremist?
Would/Could one exist without the other? |
||
We are well aware of Islamic
atrocities occurring every day against Other - if humanity had a home
appliance which caused the same bloody mayhem would not sanity prevail and it
be banned from sale? Did not Humanity decide to purposefully crush Nazi's for
the reason their dogma was an enabler of proven atrocities against Other? Why do we not apply the same rigor against
religions whose foundation text is a clear enabler of proven atrocities against
Other with subjugation of women thrown in?
Should we not therefore be rightly upset if
we see either on the streets of a Democracy for exactly the same reasons?
Three
jailed for army base terror plot BY: CAMERON STEWART From: The Australian
December 16, 2011 and the rest
Could Islamist rebels undermine change in Africa? Reuters OCT 28, 2011 04:35 EDT
"Creeping from the
periphery.."
The trouble is elsewhere in the Foundation text spewed by these Religion of
Certainty prophets of hatred against Other is in major part vilifying Other in
the most diabolical manner and saying Others lot unassisted by adherents will
come of its own occurred because indeed they are evil, diseased etc - Other is
qualified - change the foundation text or change nothing the terror continues.
The
fact is we know if Other are left alone 'grievous harm' is just as likely to
be applied in equal measure to adherents and non-adherents - given the
promise adherents are indeed the chosen ones and therefore favoured - this cannot
be allowed. We know why it happens why do we allow it to continue?
BOKO HARAM SPOKESMAN THREATENS
NIGERIAN CHRISTIANS AFP
January 2, 2012, 10:17 pm
Religious Trauma Syndrome: An
Overview of Dr. Marlene Winell’s Article in the
British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapies December 3, 2011 By Mriana
The Simple Answer to Ending the Terror - Plato Knew
it years Ago Why have we not Understood?
Please fill out the following
petitions and send to the Australian Parliament.
Petition to the Australian Parliament HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES to enable Security and Happiness1
Petition to the Australian Parliament HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES to enable Security and Happiness2
The Petition above should be
submitted by post. The Committee's address is:
Standing Committee on Petitions
PO Box 6021
House of Representatives
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT 2600
AUSTRALIA
Petition to the Australian Parliament Senate to
enable Security and Happiness1
Petition to the Australian Parliament Senate to
enable Security and Happiness2
The Senate Petition above should be
submitted by post to:
Petitions Officer
Senate Table Office, SG. 25
Parliament House
Canberra, ACT 2600.
Draft Constitution - Enabling the
Independence of a Citizen be they Women, Men or Other
Israelis Facing a Seismic Rift Over
Role of Women NYT By ETHAN BRONNER and ISABEL KERSHNER Published:
January 14, 2012
Think the above link ‘Israelis Facing
a Seismic Rift Over Role of Women’ is unrelated - Oh dear.
If I am just
possibly right should not the full force of humanities genius be brought to bare to enable new citizens to realise their full potential
by articulating why and how foundation text which vilifies Other is not benign
but clearly deleterious to the Human condition.
Once this is established which I am relatively certain it will, then proceed to determine what foundation text will be utilised, methods for educating new citizens, and institute appropriate controls ensure citizens and new immigrants adhere to ethics of not utilising foundation text against Other.